Novel gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection training model enhances the endoscopic submucosal dissection skills of trainees: a multicenter comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) requires high endoscopic technical skills, and trainees should develop effective training methods. In collaboration with KOTOBUKI Medical, we developed the G-Master, which is a non-animal training model that can simulate various parts of gastric ESD. We aimed to clarify the usefulness of the G-Master for inexperienced ESD trainees. METHODS: We collected data from the first 5 gastric ESD cases conducted by 15 inexperienced ESD trainees at 5 participating centers between 2018 and 2022. The participants were divided into two groups: the G-Master training and non-G-Master training groups. Outcome measurements, such as procedural speed, perforation rate, self-completion rate, and en bloc resection rate, were compared between the two groups retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 75 gastric ESD cases were included in this study. The G-Master training group included 25 cases performed by 5 trainees, whereas the non-G-Master training group included 50 cases performed by 10 trainees. The median procedural speed for all cases was significantly faster in the G-Master training group than in the non-G-Master training group. Moreover, the procedural speed was linearly improved from the initial to the last cases in the lower location in the G-Master training group compared with the non-G-Master training group. In addition, although there was no significant difference, the G-Master training group showed lower rates of perforation and a lesser need to transition to expert operators than the non-G-Master training group. CONCLUSION: The G-Master could improve the ESD skills of inexperienced ESD trainees.

Prospective multicenter trial of the cryoballoon ablation system for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on the post-endoscopic resection scar. A CRYO-SCAR study (EPOC1902).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic resection (ER) is a minimally invasive treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). Post-ER scars complicate en bloc resection, even with advanced techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection. The cryoballoon ablation system (CBAS) effectively manages Barrett's esophagus but has limited evidence in SESCC treatment, particularly on post-ER scars. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the CBAS for treating SESCC on post-ER scars. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at two tertiary referral centers in Japan in patients endoscopically diagnosed with T1a SESCC on the post-ER scar. Focal CBAS was used for cryoablation, with specific criteria for lesion selection and treatment method. The primary endpoint was local complete response (L-CR) rate of the primary lesion 48 weeks after the first cryoablation as evaluated by an independent central evaluation committee. RESULTS: From October 2020 to October 2021, 15 patients with 17 lesions underwent cryoablation, with two requiring repeat cryoablation. The L-CR rate for primary and all lesions evaluated by the central evaluation committee was 100%. The endoscopist's evaluation was consistent with these results. The median procedure time was 9 min. Eight patients experienced no pain, and the highest pain score reported on a numeric 1-10 rating scale was 3. The technical success rate was 94.7% (18/19). Throughout the median follow-up period of 14.3 months, recurrences, deaths, or severe treatment-related adverse events were not reported. CONCLUSIONS: CBAS is a potentially safe and effective approach for SESCC on post-ER scars and represents an encouraging alternative to traditional endoscopic treatments.

Outcomes of repeated endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on endoscopic resection scar.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be performed for superficial esophageal cancer. However, performing ESD for superficial esophageal cancer on a previous endoscopic resection scar may be difficult. METHODS: We compared the outcomes between ESD for superficial esophageal cancers on previous endoscopic resection scar (group A) and that for naïve lesions (group B). The study included outcomes of ESD, cumulative incidence of local failure, and predictors of the occurrence of local failure in ESD patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The outcome variables evaluated were en bloc resection rates, procedure times, adverse events, and overall survival rates. RESULTS: Overall, 220 lesions were extracted (groups A and B: 23 and 197 lesions, respectively). In groups A and B, the complete resection rates were 60.9 and 92.9% (P < 0.001), and the mean procedure times were 79 and 68 min (P = 0.15), respectively. The perforation rates in groups A and B were 4.3 and 1% (P = 0.28). The 1-year cumulative local failure rates were 22 and 1% (P < 0.001), respectively. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, superficial esophageal SCC on a previous endoscopic resection scar was a strong predictor of local failure (hazard ratio = 21.95 [3.99-120.80], P < 0.001). The 3-year overall survival rates in groups A and B were 95 and 93% (P = 0.99), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated ESD on scar is an option for treating superficial esophageal SCC with an acceptable rate of adverse events. Because of the low complete resection rate and high local failure compared with conventional ESD, strict endoscopic follow-up is required after repeated esophageal ESD.

Immunohistochemistry and oxygen saturation endoscopic imaging reveal hypoxia in submucosal invasive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxic microenvironment is prominent in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, it is unclear whether ESCC becomes hypoxic when it remains in the mucosal layer or as it invades the submucosal layer. We aimed to investigate whether intramucosal (Tis-T1a) or submucosal invasive (T1b) ESCC becomes hypoxic using endoscopic submucosal dissection samples. METHODS: We evaluated the expression of hypoxia markers including hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) by H-score and vessel density by microvessel count (MVC) and microvessel density (MVD) for CD31 and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) with immunohistochemical staining (n = 109). Further, we quantified oxygen saturation (StO2 ) with oxygen saturation endoscopic imaging (OXEI) (n = 16) and compared them to non-neoplasia controls, Tis-T1a, and T1b. RESULTS: In Tis-T1a, cccIX (13.0 vs. 0.290, p < 0.001) and GLUT1 (199 vs. 37.6, p < 0.001) were significantly increased. Similarly, median MVC (22.7/mm2 vs. 14.2/mm2 , p < 0.001) and MVD (0.991% vs. 0.478%, p < 0.001) were markedly augmented. Additionally, in T1b, the mean expression of HIF-1α (16.0 vs. 4.95, p < 0.001), CAIX (15.7 vs. 0.290, p < 0.001), and GLUT1 (177 vs. 37.6, p < 0.001) were significantly heightened, and median MVC (24.8/mm2 vs. 14.2/mm2 , p < 0.001) and MVD (1.51% vs. 0.478%, p < 0.001) were markedly higher. Furthermore, OXEI revealed that median StO2 was significantly lower in T1b than in non-neoplasia (54% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.00131) and tended to be lower in T1b than in Tis-T1a (54% vs. 62%, p = 0.0606). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ESCC becomes hypoxic even at an early stage, and is especially prominent in T1b.

Clinical outcome of endoscopic-assisted transoral surgery for superficial cancer of pharyngo-esophageal junction.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic-assisted transoral surgery (TOS) for superficial cancer of the pharyngo-esophageal junction (PEJ) is risk of stricture, and therapeutic outcomes are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of endoscopic-assisted TOS for superficial PEJ cancers. METHODS: We retrospectively compared clinical outcomes of endoscopic-assisted TOS for superficial PEJ cancers (group A) and of other sites in the hypopharynx (group B). RESULTS: The group A comprised 12 lesions in 12 patients, and group B comprised 198 lesions in 146 patients. Group A and group B exhibited en bloc resection rates of 100% and 99%. Median operative times were 82 and 37 min (p < 0.001). The frequency of stricture and local recurrence in group A was significantly higher in group B (42% vs. 1%, p < 0.001; 25% vs. 6%, p = 0.036). All adverse events could be managed with conservative treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic-assisted TOS is not ideal for treating superficial PEJ cancers compared to other sites.

Efficacy and safety of repeated endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure for benign esophageal stricture.

Background and study aims: Radial incision and cutting (RIC) is indicated for refractory benign esophageal strictures after curative treatment for esophageal cancer and has shown favorable short-term outcomes. However, re-stricture after RIC may occur in the long term, and RIC is performed repeatedly in such cases, but the efficacy and safety of repeated RIC are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the repeated RIC for refractory benign esophageal strictures after surgical and non-surgical treatment. Patients and methods: Between April 2008 and September 2019, we enrolled patients who were treated with the first RIC for benign esophageal strictures. The RIC was indicated for the refractory stricture and repeatedly performed for re-refractory esophageal stricture after RIC. We retrospectively evaluated the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate, and adverse events (AEs) in the first RIC and repeated RICs. Results: Forty-six patients (39 men, 7 women; median age, 71 years, range 49-85) were included. RIC was performed once in 24 patients (non-repeated RIC group) and two or more times in 22 patients (repeated RIC group). In all patients, the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate after the first RIC were 42.3 %. In the repeated RIC group, the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate after the first and repeated RICs were 18.2 % vs 18.2 %, respectively. No AEs were noted. Conclusions: Repeated RIC could be effective in the short-term and safe even for patients with refractory benign esophageal stricture after the first RIC. However, it cannot be considered curative treatment for refractory stricture because of poor long-term results.

Prospective study on the risk of transmission due to droplets and aerosols during an endoscopic procedure and the usefulness of extraoral suction devices.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopy poses a high risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection for medical personnel due to the dispersal of aerosols from the patient. We investigated the location and size of droplets generated during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the contamination of the surrounding area before and after the procedures, and the effectiveness of using an extraoral suction device (Free arm arteo; TOKYO GIKEN, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). METHODS: Patients who consented to the study and underwent EGD or ESD between December 8, 2020, and April 15, 2021, at the National Cancer Center East Hospital were included. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hygiene monitoring tests and a particle counter were used for measurements. RESULTS: Assessments were performed on 22 EGD and 15 ESD cases. ATP hygiene monitoring tests showed significant elevations at three sites near the patient, and two sites 1.5 m away, for EGD, and at four sites near the patient and 1.5 m away for ESD. In both ESD and EGD, extraoral suction devices reduced the extent of the contamination. Particles <5 µm in size were generated during endoscopic procedures and dispersed from both the forceps hole and the patient's mouth. The extraoral suction device did not reduce the number of particles generated. CONCLUSIONS: During endoscopic procedures, cleaning the surrounding environment is important in addition to standard precautions the endoscopist and caregivers take. The use of extraoral suction devices can also potentially reduce contamination of the surrounding environment.

Endoscopic management of familial adenomatous polyposis targeting colorectal lesions greater than 5 mm in size: a single-center retrospective study.

Preserving the colon while preventing colorectal cancer is challenging in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Although prophylactic colectomy is the current standard of care, some patients with familial adenomatous polyposis may wish to postpone colectomy as long as polyposis can be managed by endoscopic resection. This study examined our endoscopic management and prognostic results for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who refused to undergo colectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 12 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis treated at our hospital between January 1995 and December 2020. All patients opted to postpone prophylactic colectomy although they had significant polyp burdens and underwent endoscopic management, in which colorectal polyps sized > 5 mm were thoroughly resected during baseline colonoscopies and subsequently, newly arising colorectal polyps sized > 5 mm were periodically resected during surveillance colonoscopies. Patients (median age, 33 years) were followed up for a median of 5.2 years. The median number of colonoscopies and resected lesions per patient was 2 and 14 at baseline as well as, 9 and 32 during surveillance, respectively. The interval between colonoscopies was 1.0 and 7.0 months for baseline and surveillance, respectively. The colons of all 12 patients were preserved, and no invasive colorectal cancer developed. In 10 patients, 35 cases of high-grade dysplasia were observed and managed by endoscopic resection. Repeated endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps sized > 5 mm with appropriate surveillance may be an alternative form of endoscopic management for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis wishing to postpone colectomy.

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound in predicting treatment efficacy of salvage endoscopic therapy for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Salvage endoscopic therapy, including endoscopic resection (ER) and photodynamic therapy (PDT), is effective for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in local failure after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Resection with pathologically vertical margin-negative (VM0) for ER and local complete response (L-CR) for PDT are important surrogate prognostic markers for each therapy's efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in predicting the efficacy of salvage endoscopic therapy in local failure after CRT for ESCC. METHODS: We included patients who underwent EUS followed by ER or PDT for local failure after CRT or radiotherapy for ESCC from 2006 to 2020. We evaluated EUS findings associated with VM0 resection for ER and L-CR for PDT, which included the status of the outermost part of the submucosal layer, tumor thickness, and tumor invasion length into the muscularis propria (MP) layer. RESULTS: Thirty and 47 patients were enrolled into the ER and PDT groups, respectively. The VM0 resection rate in the ER group was 87% (26/30). The EUS findings associated with VM0 resection were tumor thickness < 2.3 mm (p = 0.01) and preserved hyperechoic line of the outermost part of the submucosa layer (p < 0.01). The L-CR rate in the PDT group was 69% (32/47). The EUS findings associated with L-CR were tumor thickness < 5.0 mm (p < 0.01) and tumor invasion length into the MP layer < 1.6 mm (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: EUS can be useful in predicting the efficacy of salvage endoscopic treatment for local failure after CRT for ESCC.

Development of new gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection training model: A reproducibility evaluation study.

Background and study aims Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a highly technical procedure mainly due to the distinctive shape of the stomach and diverse locations of lesions. We developed a new gastric ESD training model (G-Master) that could accurately recreate the location of the stomach and assessed the reproducibility of located lesions in the model. Methods The model comprises a simulated mucous membrane sheet made of konjac flour and a setting frame, which can simulate 11 locations of the stomach. We assessed the reproducibility of each location in the model by assessing the procedure speed and using a questionnaire that was distributed among experts. In the questionnaire, each location was scored on a six-point scale for similarity of locations. Results The mean score for all locations was high with > 4 points. Regarding locations, lower anterior and posterior walls had medium scores with 3 to 4 points. The procedure speed was slower in the greater curvature of the upper and middle gastric portions, where ESD is considered more difficult than the overall procedure speed. Conclusions The new gastric ESD training model appears to be highly reproducible for each gastric location and its application for training in assuming actual gastric ESD locations.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy has comparable survival outcomes to esophagectomy in patients with clinical T1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: real-world data.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the JCOG0502 has shown a comparable efficacy of chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy in patients with clinical T1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, few studies have compared the clinical outcomes of these treatments in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (including elderly patients) based on real-world data. METHODS: This retrospective study determined real-world outcomes in patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy or esophagectomy, including those with clinical T1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, between 2009 and 2017 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. RESULTS: Among a total of 156 patients, 120 and 36 patients underwent esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy, respectively; 138, 12 and 6 patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, and 2, respectively; and 33 and 123 patients had clinical tumor depth MM-SM1 and SM2-SM3, respectively. In a median follow-up of 72 months, 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival were respectively 77.0% and 81.5% in the esophagectomy group and 74.4% and 82.6% in the chemoradiotherapy group (P = 0.48 and, P = 0.89). Moreover, no treatment-related death was detected in both groups. In elderly patients (75 years or older), 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy groups (5-year progression-free survival: 72.3% vs. 81.8%, P = 0.38; 5-year overall survival: 76.9% vs. 81.8%, P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study confirms the results of a previous clinical trial, and the present findings support chemoradiotherapy as one of the standard treatment options in patients of all ages with clinical T1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Salvage endoscopic resection for cT1N0M0 local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection.

OBJECTIVES: Salvage endoscopic resection is recommended when the local recurrence at primary site after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is localized and superficial. This retrospective study aimed to comparatively analyse the short-term outcomes and local control of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection versus salvage endoscopic mucosal resection for local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 96 patients who underwent initial salvage endoscopic resection for cT1N0M0 local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between December 1998 and August 2019 patients were assigned to either the salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection (40 patients; 40 lesions) or salvage endoscopic mucosal resection (56 patients; 56 lesions) group. We evaluated the en bloc and R0 resection rates, severe adverse events and local failure rate after salvage endoscopic resection. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors of local failure after salvage endoscopic resection. RESULTS: The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection group than in the salvage endoscopic mucosal resection group (95% versus 63%; P < 0.001). There were no differences in R0 resection rate between the two groups (73% versus 52%, P = 0.057). One patient (3%) in the salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection group had perforation. The 3-year cumulative local failure rate of salvage endoscopic mucosal resection was significantly higher than that of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection (27% versus 5%, P = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, salvage endoscopic mucosal resection (hazard ratio: 2.7, P = 0.044) was the only independent risk factor of local failure after salvage endoscopic resection. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection is the effective treatment for local recurrence based on the short-term outcomes and local efficacy.

The usefulness of a double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by non-expert endoscopists in a porcine model (with video).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an optimal treatment for colorectal tumors; however, it is technically difficult, especially for non-experts. Therefore, a device that helps non-experts perform colorectal ESD would be beneficial. A double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform (DEIP) was recently developed to assist colorectal ESD through endoscope stabilization and traction. This study assessed the usefulness of colorectal ESD using the DEIP (DEIP-ESD) by endoscopists, including non-experts, in a living porcine model. METHODS: Two pigs were used to perform eight DEIP-ESD and eight conventional cap-assisted ESD (C-ESD) procedures. Three experts and five non-experts each resected one lesion using DEIP-ESD and one using C-ESD. We evaluated the treatment outcomes and performed stratified analyses between the experts and non-experts. RESULTS: Dissection speed was significantly faster in DEIP-ESD than in C-ESD (13.3 mm2/min vs 28.5 mm2/min, P = 0.002). However, the total procedure time did not differ significantly between DEIP-ESD and C-ESD. In the stratified analyses, the dissection speed of non-experts was significantly faster in DEIP-ESD than in C-ESD (10.9 mm2/min vs 25.1 mm2/min, P = 0.016), while that of experts increased in DEIP-ESD but to a lesser extent (19.1 mm2/min vs 28.8 mm2/min, P = 0.1). The total procedure time did not differ between DEIP-ESD and C-ESD for both experts and non-experts. The self-completion rate of non-experts also increased in DEIP-ESD. Moreover, the number of muscularis propria injuries induced by non-experts was fewer in DEIP-ESD than in C-ESD. CONCLUSIONS: DEIP could facilitate colorectal ESD by improving dissection efficiency without increasing adverse events, especially when performed by non-experts.

A novel imaging technology to assess oxygen saturation of the gastric conduit in thoracic esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Real-time evaluation of blood perfusion is important when selecting the site of anastomosis during thoracic esophagectomy. This study investigated a novel imaging technology that assesses tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) in the gastric conduit and examined its efficacy. METHODS: Fifty-one patients undergoing thoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer who underwent intraoperative StO2 endoscopic imaging to assess the gastric conduit for the optimal site of anastomosis were examined. Efficacy of oxygen saturation imaging and patient outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: All 51 patients underwent esophagectomy without intraoperative problems. Mean StO2 in the gastric tube was highest at the pre-pylorus area and then gradually decreased proceeding toward the tip. StO2 was well preserved in areas supplied by the right gastroepiploic artery but low in other areas. Anastomotic sites were selected based on StO2 imaging and tension considerations; most were located within 3 cm of the end of the right gastroepiploic artery. Three patients developed postoperative anastomotic leakage (5.8%). Mean StO2 at the point of anastomosis was significantly lower in the patients who experienced leakage than in those who did not (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative endoscopic StO2 imaging is useful in esophageal cancer patients undergoing thoracic esophagectomy to determine the optimal site for anastomosis to minimize the risk of anastomotic leakage.

Recurrent metastasis risk factors in esophageal cancer after salvage endoscopic resection for local failure following chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Although salvage endoscopic resection is an optimal treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, recurrent metastasis (lymph node and/or distant metastasis) after salvage endoscopic resection may occur with a certain degree of unavoidable frequency and is associated with a poor prognosis. However, the risk factors for recurrent metastasis are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for recurrent metastasis after salvage endoscopic resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent salvage endoscopic resection for local failure after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy were analyzed in this single-center, retrospective study. We evaluated the cumulative incidence rates of recurrent metastases, overall survival, and the risk factors for recurrent metastasis after salvage endoscopic resection. RESULTS: We analyzed 132 patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate of recurrent metastases after salvage endoscopic resection was 25.7%. The 5-year overall survival rates in all patients and in patients with recurrent metastasis were 66.8% and 22.5%, respectively. Local failure pattern with a residual lesion after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio 2.34; P = 0.012) and the presence of lymphatic invasion in salvage endoscopic resection specimen (subdistribution hazard ratio 3.20; P = 0.002) were significant risk factors for recurrent metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with local failure pattern with a residual lesion after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy and presence of lymphatic invasion have a high risk for recurrent metastasis. Thus, appropriate surveillance for these patients should be considered.

The characteristics of missed pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers at gastrointestinal endoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Understanding the miss rate and characteristics of missed pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy may aid in reducing the endoscopic miss rate of this cancer type. However, little is known regarding the miss rate and characteristics of such cancers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic miss rate of oro-hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers, the characteristics of the missed cancers, and risk factors associated with the missed cancers. METHODS: Patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and were pathologically diagnosed with oro-hypopharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma from January 2019 to November 2020 at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. Missed cancers were defined as those diagnosed within 15 months after a negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 240 lesions were finally included. Eighty-five lesions were classified as missed cancers, and 155 lesions as non-missed cancers. The upper gastrointestinal endoscopic miss rate for oro-hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers was 35.4%. Multivariate analysis revealed that a tumor size of <13 mm (odds ratio: 1.96, P=0.026), tumors located on the anterior surface of the epiglottis/valleculae (odds ratio: 2.98, P=0.045) and inside of the pyriform sinus (odds ratio: 2.28, P=0.046) were associated with missed cancers. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a high miss rate of oro-hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers during endoscopic observations. High-quality upper gastrointestinal endoscopic observation and awareness of missed cancer may help reduce this rate.

Factors of technical difficulty in conventional and traction-assisted esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: The traction assisted (TA) method has reduced the technical difficulty associated with esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, it is unclear which factors associated with difficulty have been improved by the TA-ESD method. We aimed to evaluate and compare difficulty factors between conventional and TA-ESD. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled patients treated by ESD from Apr 2010 to Jun 2014 for the conventional ESD cohort and from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019 for the TA-ESD cohort. Difficult cases were defined as; (1) ≥ 120 min ESD procedure time, (2) intraoperative perforation, or (3) piecemeal resection. We explored and compared the factors associated with technical difficulty in each cohort. RESULTS: The conventional and TA-ESD cohorts included 285 (299 lesions) and 387 (421 lesions) patients, respectively. For difficult cases, the conventional and TA-ESD cohorts had 91 (30%) and 71 (17%) lesions, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression showed that ≥ 30 mm lesion length (odds ratio (OR) 6.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.47-13.50), lower esophagus (OR 2.37, 95% Cl 1.34-4.21), > 1/2 circumference (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-3.99), and left wall (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.42-5.20) in the conventional ESD cohort, and ≥ 30 mm lesion length (21.30, 95% CI 4.75-95.30), lower esophagus (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.52-6.13), and > 1/2 circumference (OR 6.40, 95% CI 3.06-13.40) in the TA-ESD cohort, were independently associated with technical difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: TA-ESD can reduce the difficulty in cases including lesions in the left wall; however, cases in the lower esophagus and large lesions were still difficult to simplify.

Pivotal trial of a biodegradable stent for patients with refractory benign esophageal stricture.

OBJECTIVE: Benign esophageal strictures (BES) cause dysphagia and decrease patients' quality of life. Although mechanical dilation is the standard of care for BES, in some patients, dysphagia is unrelieved despite repeated procedures. The biodegradable stent was developed to resolve refractory BES, with reported favorable outcomes, but it is unapproved in Japan. Thus, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the biodegradable stent (BDS) for patients with refractory BES for regulatory approval. METHODS: This was a nonrandomized single-arm prospective trial conducted at eight institutions. We included patients with BES after ≥ 5 times of dilation or ≥ one time of radial incision and cutting whose dysphagia score (DS) was 2 or worse and an endoscope could not admit. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose DS improvement of ≤ 1 was maintained at 3 months. RESULTS: Thirty patients (median age: 69 years, male/female: 27:3) were enrolled and treated; BDS placement failed in 1 patient. Fourteen patients maintained their DS improvement until 3 months after placement (proportion of DS improvement at 3 months 46.7% [95% CI: 28.3-65.7]), and the median dysphagia-free survival was 98 days [95% CI: 68-123]. Most adverse events could be managed conservatively; however, a patient with BES after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) developed an esophago-left atrium fistula and died approximately 4 months after stent placement. CONCLUSION: The BDS was effective for refractory BES and the safety was acceptable. However, the indication for this procedure in patients RECEIVING CRT for esophageal cancer should be carefully considered.

The safety and feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a flexible three-dimensional endoscope for early gastric cancer and superficial esophageal cancer: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is performed as one of standard treatments for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) and superficial esophageal squamous cancer (SESCC). A prototype of a flexible endoscope with a 3-D system has been recently developed. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of ESD using a 3-D flexible endoscope (3-D ESD) for EGC and SESCC. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent planned 3-D ESD. The clinical outcomes, including the incidence of adverse events and treatment results, were analyzed. Visibility and manipulation during 3-D ESD were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). We also evaluated the effect of the 3-D system on the endoscopist using VAS and the critical flicker fusion frequency (CFFF). RESULTS: We analyzed 47 EGC and 20 SESCC cases. There are no bleeding cases that required transfusion and perforation during 3-D ESD in both EGC and SESCC patients. However, the incidence of delayed bleeding and delayed perforation was 1.5% (one case) each. The mean VAS scores for recognizing the submucosal layer during the submucosal dissection, visual perception of blood vessel, and depth perception were 72.7 ± 22.2, 74.7 ± 21.8, and 78.2 ± 19.9, respectively. In contrast, the mean VAS score for manipulation was 25.4 ± 19.7. Among endoscopists, there was no significant difference in the VAS of eyestrain and headache before and after ESD, and there was no significant difference in the CFFF. CONCLUSION: The safety and feasibility of 3-D ESD for EGC and SESCC are acceptable in both patients and endoscopists.